<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The wall stays in the picture, for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/</link>
	<description>Denver&#039;s hottest new bars, bands and clubs at your fingertips. Wondering what to do tonight? Stick with us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:57:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-beta-1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Wenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Sara -- This is a blog so editorializing is fine as long as I&#039;m not distorting the facts. And even though you think we&#039;re making much ado about nothing, we have yet to misrepresent this case. We actually wrote in the above post that the assistant city attorney who oversees the board called it &quot;a mistake,&quot; which is what you referenced when you talked about the internal error. We never predicted MTV was going to get nailed to the wall for this. Anyway, sorry to make you go out of your way to attend a boring meeting, but what do you expect from a design review committee? We weren&#039;t making it salacious, just placing it in context...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara &#8212; This is a blog so editorializing is fine as long as I&#8217;m not distorting the facts. And even though you think we&#8217;re making much ado about nothing, we have yet to misrepresent this case. We actually wrote in the above post that the assistant city attorney who oversees the board called it &#8220;a mistake,&#8221; which is what you referenced when you talked about the internal error. We never predicted MTV was going to get nailed to the wall for this. Anyway, sorry to make you go out of your way to attend a boring meeting, but what do you expect from a design review committee? We weren&#8217;t making it salacious, just placing it in context&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrealdenver.com/2006/08/03/the-wall-stays-in-the-picture-for-now/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>wow, could you fit a little more editorializing in your posts? You wasted my day! I went there out of curiosity and it was muchado about nothing. They said the wall wasnt illegal and not the fault of mtv people but an internal errror. You made it sound so salacious and it turned out to be really lame, I thought your follow up would be more honest and you still go for the salacious angel. Well, whatever, point is, if people want to read this for stupid kicks go for it....but if you read this and then actually take time out of your day to go to meetings expectig sparks tofly....expect to be dissapointed.

i didnt realize how much editorializing you put in ur columns, makes me question the validity of the rest of your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, could you fit a little more editorializing in your posts? You wasted my day! I went there out of curiosity and it was muchado about nothing. They said the wall wasnt illegal and not the fault of mtv people but an internal errror. You made it sound so salacious and it turned out to be really lame, I thought your follow up would be more honest and you still go for the salacious angel. Well, whatever, point is, if people want to read this for stupid kicks go for it&#8230;.but if you read this and then actually take time out of your day to go to meetings expectig sparks tofly&#8230;.expect to be dissapointed.</p>
<p>i didnt realize how much editorializing you put in ur columns, makes me question the validity of the rest of your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
